3/30/11

Sucker Punch directed by Zach Snyder

Sucker Punch
Rated PG-13 (Some graphic and mature material)

Summary: The story evolves around Baby Doll, a young woman who accidentally murders her younger sister, in an attempt to prevent her cruel and demented step-father from sexually abusing the little girl. Dragged to the insane asylum, the step-father pays an orderly to have Baby Doll committed, and lobotomized, sealing her innocence forever.

Disclaimer: It should be noted that I’m not a huge fan of Zach Snyder. Though I loved “Legend of the Guardians; The Owls of Ga’Hoole”, I hated “300" and I HATED “Watchmen". For the most part, I cannot handle that style of cinema, specially paired with dark subject matter.

My Review: Even though I’m not a fan of Snyder and his style of directing, I had big hopes for this film. I really, really, wanted to love it.

But, for the most part the movie was exactly what you thought it would be. Fruitless, plotless, and full of hot chicks in cool outfits, kicking major ass. So you have to go in with that mentality, knowing you can’t think and you can’t try and figure out what’s going on. But! That’s where I think Snyder missed out. In the beginning, the film follows Baby Doll from the time of her mother’s death, up to the moment that she is wrongly committed to an insane asylum, and unfortunately awaits her fate; a lobotomy in five days. Essentially, this part was actually not that bad, as dark and crude as it was.

Then, the film almost starts over and now we are in a whore house/theatre and Baby Doll has been dropped off by a deceitful priest as an orphan, with the arrangement that she will be sold to a “high roller” in five days.

Then once again, in this world, she is able to head off into a third “dream-like” state when she dances; the other world allowing her to fight, control her enemies and plot her escape.

It is here that the movie fails. There is just too much “dream-like” state going on where essentially, there is only ass kicking happening. Though I have no problem with that Japanese Anime style of fighting, I felt like I was watching a video game... That lasted almost two hours!

To me, the movie just got boring... and I began to hate the special effects, because ultimately, I just wanted the freaking story to move along.

Stylistically, the movie was cool though. That, I will give it. And the acting was actually not that bad, either. It’s true monumental flaw was that it really lacked any real plot or story. It felt like two hours of CGI.

So, if you love Zach Snyder and you love movies like Sin City, 300 or Watchmen, then you’ll want to check this out in theatres. But, if you can’t handle bad-ass women with tons of make-up and short skirts, fighting for two hours; catch it on DVD.

Since I don’t have half stars to give it a 2 1/2, I’m leaning toward the 2 mark. Sorry, this one is a fail for me.


Cast and Credit:
Directed by Zack Snyder
Emily Browning-Baby Doll
Abbie Cornish-Sweet Pea
Jena Malone-Rocket
Vanessa Hudgens-Blondie
Jamie Chung-Amber
Carla Gugino-Dr. Vera Gorski
Oscar Isaac-Blue Jones

3/29/11

The Evolution of Calpurnia Tate by Jacqueline Kelly

Genre: Fiction, Age level 9-12
Author: Jacqueline Kelly
Publisher: Henry Holt and Company, 1st Edition May, 2009

Summary: As eleven-year old Calpurnia Virginia Tate explores the natural world around her, she comes up against just what it means to be a girl at the turn of the century.

Noe’s Review: I often look through my English teacher’s book closet at school, hoping to find a good read. I was drawn to this cover because it looked quite pretty next to its duller comrades. And so I took it home, thus beginning the evolution of my, Noelani Simone’s adventures, through reading this novel.

What I loved about this book was that it was a very well written, drama-free story about a young girl (about my age) and her grandfather.

Set in the late 1800’s, Calpurnia lives in a small town in Texas with her very large family. Noticing a new colored grasshopper, she approaches her grandfather with the question, “What are those?” Refusing to answer her question, he encourages her to go find the answer herself. This is the beginning, of what fuels her passion for science. In turn, her grandfather discovers that he may have a prodigy on his hands. They form a bond over their love for science, and it is because of this growing relationship that Calpurnia finds herself, and matures.

I found myself able to relate to the character--I love science, and so does Calpurnia. It inspired my zen phase. I would sit outside and try my best to count the number of trees and such around me (which was a total fail). This book is very inspiring and has had a long lasting effect on me. I see things differently now.

As for the extra characters, I loved them all.

I highly recommend this book for every young woman. It is a great story about self discovery. ~ Noelani


3/28/11

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules directed by David Bowers

Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules
Rated PG

Summary: Dairy of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules is the sequel to the 2010 film, Diary of a Wimpy Kid, based on the ever popular book series by Jeff Kinney. 

In this continuation, Greg Heffley is now a 7th grader, yet, gaining a step up in the middle school ladder proves ominous, as his brother still finds ways to creatively torment him.

Disclaimer: Both of my daughters have read the entire book series and are huge fans of author, Jeff Kinney. The novels have a way of speaking to young teens and elementary school kids in a humorous way that seems to resonate real life. 

And as for the first film, it has been watched many times too, often as background noise for my two girls as they sit near the coffee table doing homework and eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. So of course with the release of the second installment "Rodrick Rules", I had to take one for the team and assure my girls that we would most definitely be seeing it premiere night. Because that is what mommies do... 

My Review: Somehow I knew both of my girls (age 12 and age 10) would love the movie, but as for me and my husband... we braced ourselves. With the opening of a few horrendous trailers, we prepared ourselves for what was to be, nothing short of agony. 

But strangely, I found myself laughing just as hard as my daughters. I mean, the entire film was really funny! For me in the first flick, I found Greg to be a little annoying and malicious. But in this second movie, he's much more likable and this time around, his antics are rather hilarious. 

And Greg's brother Rodrick was absolutely entertaining. The chemistry between the two boys was amped up this time around, and I think they did a great job with the script. 

From the beginning to the end, this movie was absurdly amusing and what I really loved about it was discussing our favorite scenes afterwards in the car. It is a film that the entire family can see, enjoy together and use as a means to spend some quality time. I had fun with my two little ones, and that's what matters. 

So if you haven't see this one yet, pencil it in for this weekend. It's a hit! Diary of Wimpy Kid: Rodrick rules... Rules!! 



Playing in Theatres Now!

Cast and Credit: 
Directed by David Bowers
Zachary Gordon-Greg 
Rachel Harris-Susan Heffley (Mom)
Devon Bostick-Rodrick 
Steve Zahn-Frank Heffley (Dad)

3/25/11

Book Blog Hop and Feature & Follow Friday!

Book Blogger Hop

It's Friday! And that means Jen is hosting her weekly Book Blogger Hop; a great way for book readers and bloggers, alike, to find each other, share answers to featured questions and discover each other. 

This week's question comes from Mina who blogs at Mina Burrows: "If you could physically put yourself into a book or series…which one would it be and why?"

Suz: Um... Twilight. And I would steal Edward from Bella, duh?! Winning! 

To be honest, thank god I am not a character in any of the books I read... NO... I'm content being a reader, thank you. 


Over at Parajunkee's View, we meet Rebecca from Confessions of a Page Turner and her question was: Inspired by the insane twitter trend of #100 Facts About Me, give us five book related silly facts about you. 

Suz: 
1) Even though I've read a handful of books in this genre, I don't consider myself a fan of paranormal romance. 
2) I worship Anne Rice and her writing and stalk her ebay page... I don't know why. 
3) I love Angels in books. 
4) If I know there is a film based on the book, I'll have to not only read the book but watch the film as well. I'm obsessed with both aspects. 
5) I'm not a book hoard. I believe in donating books to shelters or libraries to give other children and adults the opportunity to read books that they may not have the funds to purchase. Unless, I really love the book or it's a classic, Noe and I constantly give away books that we are done with. 

So, in wrapping up this week: 
My little Noe is reading but finding it hard to take time out to do a book blog post. I cut her slack because she's getting straight A's. 

But I managed to review the film, The Lincoln Lawyer with Matthew McConaughey. To read my movie review, click here

Also, I have reposed by book review of Michele Hauf's, Her Vampire Husband. To read my book review, click here

And that's it! Have a great weekend!!

3/23/11

Her Vampire Husband by Michele Hauf

Genre: Adult Supernatural Romance
Author: Michele Hauf
Publisher: HQN Books, Original Edition (April 1, 2010)

I had originally written my review last year, but unfortunately used the wrong blogger account and well... deleted it without saving it. So I’m reposting my thoughts because not only did I win this autographed book, but it’s too good not to share.

Summary: Werewolf princess Blu Masterson won't allow her seductive vampire husband to consummate their marriage with his bite, marking her forever. Alone in a secluded estate with her sworn enemy, Blu curses the marriage arranged to bring their rival nations together, especially since Creed Saint-Pierre calls out to her most feral desires.

When Blu uncovers her pack's secret plot to destroy the vampire nation—and Creed—she is forced to confront her growing feelings for her sexy undead husband. Will she choose the only life she's ever known or accept his vampire bite?

My Review: For the record, I have read the Twilight series and the Charlaine Harris/Sookie Stackhouse series, but I do not consider myself of a fan of paranormal romance. Maybe I’m in denial... Don’t know. Just thought I state that because I think there are many of you out there that feel the same; fear a book the minute someone mentions that it’s about a werewolf and vampire. I know. Believe me, I know.

But this book is excellent.

I can remember sitting outside my daughter’s cheerleading gym, taking this book out of my purse and hoping to kill some time while I waited... And then I devoured it. What just happened, I asked myself?

What happened was that I had luckily stumbled across a very witty, easy-breezy book about a Werewolf princess, Blu, and her vampire husband, Creed (check out the cover, ahem, nice).

The story essentially surrounds the marriage of two different supernatural beings, forced to marry one another to create a bond of peace among their people. Unexpectedly though, Blu begins to develop feelings for her sexy vampire husband, and as repulsed as she may be by his kind... Love has a funny way of blinding us to such. The problem being, werewolves and vampires loath each other, and this peace pact between the two groups is threatened by lies and deceit. Blu is forced to decide; family, or love.

What I truly liked about Hauf’s book is that I didn’t have to think. I just simply enjoyed a very fast-paced, but erotic story of two people falling in love. The characters were likable (and I’m not going to lie, Creed sounded hot... me likey, a lot) and the story was intriguing right from the first page.

(Btw, when I say erotic, let me just say I don’t know what your level of hotness is when reading, but this book registers high on the hotness. Just saying...)

What I also uniquely liked about this story, as opposed to say, Charlaine Harris’s world of supernatural beings; the realm of each being made sense. The werewolves in this story seemed very realistic, very much like I picture them to be if they really existed.

Basically, I liked the book a lot! So if you are looking for a sexy, supernatural romance novel that is intelligent, well written and moves quickly--then you’ll definitely want to check out "Her Vampire Husband”.


3/21/11

The Lincoln Lawyer directed by Brad Furman

The Lincoln Lawyer
Rated R

Summary: Based on the best selling novel by Michael Connelly, The Lincoln Lawyer is a crime thriller about an attorney and his high profile case, a young, rich man accused of violently assaulting a woman. 

My Review: Wow. Oh, wow. 

Right from the beginning, I knew I was going to like this movie. Set in Los Angeles, Matthew McConaughey (Mick Haller) plays a criminal defense attorney who is used to dealing with less than desirable clients; prostitutes, drug dealers, etc... 

When he is referred to a case involving a wealthy, young man played by Ryan Phillipe (Louis Roulet), accused of viciously beating a woman that he met in a bar, Haller knows that this is his opportunity to make some real money in what appears to be an easy win. After all, Roulet looks to be innocent and convinces everyone that the woman set this whole thing up in an attempt to extort money. But as Haller begins to investigate the details to the case, things become eerily clear that something is not right.... in fact, something is deadly wrong. 

Essentially, this a very hip and urban telling of a cat and mouse game, two very intelligent individuals, Haller and Roulet. What I liked about the movie though, is even if you have an inkling to the direction of the story, you have no idea how it's going to end. It is suspenseful, but in a very ingenious and mature way. 

Now what I loved about the film was the way it was told. It was raw, and gritty and used a fantastic R&B soundtrack to give you that essence of the streets; Los Angeles and its finest. Hands down, the music choices were brilliant. And the acting... Matthew McConaughey at his finest. Seriously, I can't say enough. He is very good in this film and I have no problems saying, Oscar worthy. But, unlike other films where maybe one actor might carry a movie, this entire cast was excellent, even down to Laurence Mason who plays Haller's driver--perfect. Let me just reiterate. The acting is superior in this film, and though I applaud McConaughey, the casting director should get a freaking brownie; great performances by all. 

Well, it's time to wrap up because spoilers are no fun and this is one of those movies where a lot is going on; A lot! But, let me leave you with this. If you think you are not one to really enjoy a heavy, drama film at the theatres, I can tell you I feel the same way in most cases. But this film is really good, almost too good to wait till it comes out on DVD. So I'm saying, definitely see The Lincoln Lawyer now, you will not be disappointed. 

And of course... Five Stars Baby!! Nothing less. 

Cast and Credit: 
Directed by Brad Furman
Matthew McConaughey-Mick Haller
Ryan Phillipe-Louis Roulet
Marisa Tormei-Maggie McPhearson
William H. Macy-Frank Levin
John Leguizamo-Val
Laurence Mason-Haller's Driver
Josh Lucas-Ted Minton 


3/18/11

Book Blog Hop and Feature & Follow Friday!

Book Blogger Hop

First, Happy Birthday to Book Blogger Hop. Many of us can thank this weekly meme for not only helping us find other great blogs, but for others to find us. So thank you to Jennifer from Crazy For Books, for hosting each week. 

This week's question comes from Somer at A Bird's Eye Review: "Do you read only one book at a time, or do you have several going at once?"

A for both Noe and I: One at a time. I know with the both of us, we may from time to time put down a book that doesn't really have our interest, only to start another, but generally speaking we prefer to concentrate on reading one book at time. After all, we don't get paid to read. We do it for fun. How about you?


Over at Parajunkee's View, we meet Jess from Gone With Words with this week's question: "How did you come up with your blog name?"

A: Easy, peasy. We love to read and watch movies... and watch reality tv... and travel magazines... and fashion blogs... OMG, you get the picture. Both my daughter and I are huge film buffs and LOVE reading a good book. So naturally, we wanted to showcase our thoughts in a blog that captured both of our passions. Though the blog should be "we" and not "I", oh well. Whatever. 

~o~

We end this week with some thoughts:

Being residents of Hawaii, we experienced one of the biggest scares in our life last Thursday night as we were forced to evacuate our home because of the tsunami warning (and after seeing images stream from Sendai). Though parts of our islands did experience some damage and severe flooding, nothing could be more devastating than what has happened to our friendly neighbor, Japan. See here in Hawaii, many of the businesses depend on tourism and believe it or not, a big part of the visitor industry comes from Japan. Our hearts and prayers go out to the people of Japan and to those loved ones who have relatives or friends living there. Honestly, we couldn't feel sicker about the situation.

So we felt it necessary to take a break from our blogging this last week and focused our efforts on helping raise money for Japan. For many of you, the easiest way possible is to text Red Cross at 90999 and a $10 donation will be billed to your cell phone. Just a reminder, if you are looking at various organizations and charities, make sure the link or site you are visiting is a legitimate website. There are a lot of scams out there that prey off tragic disasters (as sick as that might be), so just double check before your donate. 


Mahalo and Have a great weekend. 

3/9/11

Red Riding Hood directed by Catherine Hardwicke

Red Riding Hood
Rated PG-13

Summary: For decades, the people of the village of Daggerhorn have maintained an uneasy truce with the werewolf, who prowls at every full moon, by offering the beast a monthly animal sacrifice to quench its appetite. But under a blood red moon, the wolf changes the stakes by taking the life of one of their own.

My review: Being a fan of Catherine Hardwicke (Twilight), I had high expectations for this film and its hard to wrap my head around the ones she failed at and the ones she succeeded.

Visually, there are beautiful, wide distant shots of the gorgeous landscape; the woods and snow capped mountains and the aerial views were simply stunning, with Valerie's (Amanda Seyfried) famous red hood, blowing precariously in the wind.  Even things that you might not notice at first glance, held me captive in a fairy tale state of being, with large thorns sticking out of gigantic red woods, hidden patches of wild flowers peeking through patches of winter ice; I will definitely give credit to the backdrop and scenery. It was bewitching.

But unfortunately, I then became spoiled by such alluring images that when we focused just on the villagers and their homes, something felt amiss. I think my biggest complaint about the "essence" of the film, is the way they talked. I've never really had issue with this before, but their modern dialog felt out of place, in what appears to be a medieval community; a rural village high in the hilltops. In particular, Max Irons, who plays Henry just killed me at times. I'm not sure if it was his acting, or his looks, but his parts just weren't good.

But I will say Amanda Seyfried did a great job. If it were not for her big, teary eyes, I would never have believed that a werewolf was stalking this village. Shiloh Fernandez, who plays her love interest, Peter, did good as well; actually worlds better than Max.

As for the other actors; Gary Oldman (creepy werewolf hunter), Billy Burke (hello handsome, drunk father), Virginia Madsen (has big, beady eyes like Amanda), and Julie Christie (perfect as the grandmother).

So now that we know nobody will be getting an Oscar nod for their performance, let's take a closer look at the actual plot of the story.

The famous love triangle: Valerie is promised to Henry, who comes from money but loves Peter, a simple woodsman. I really found this ridiculous since everybody's wooden hut looked the same, what money? They are in the mountains with a werewolf that they have to feed every full moon. These two elements didn't work. I think essentially we could have cut Henry's scenes out and just focused on the strained relationship of Peter and Valerie; the biggest threat being, who can you really trust? Who is the werewolf, if it can live among you? Henry's story for me, was a waste of film and he was so annoying that I could see why Valerie didn't want to marry him.

As for the mystery and danger to a werewolf stalking the village; Hardwicke got this right! The movie almost felt like Francis Ford Coppola's Dracula (and maybe a little Van Helsing), which I loved. In fact, screw the PG rating, I wished they would have gone full horror, and made it darker and more graphic. What I found that Catherine did an AMAZING job at, was keeping the audience in suspense. I heard this from many moviegoers that they had no idea who the wolf was. So essentially, the story is a murder mystery with a supernatural element to it. Did it need the love story? I think that was fine and like I stated before, it could have been expanded upon. After all, there is no greater pain than betrayal.

So in the end because of its beautiful imagery, haunting tale of murder... I give this movie four stars and recommend that this is one you see in the theatre (without kids).

Cast and Credit: 
Directed by Catherine Hardwick
Amanda Seyfried-Valerie
Max Irons-Henry
Shiloh Fernandez-Peter
Billy Burke-Valerie's father
Virginia Madsen-Valerie's mother
Gary Oldman-Solomon
Julie Christie-Grandmother

3/8/11

American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis

Genre; Adult Fiction, Psychological thriller, Murder mystery. NOT suitable for any person under 18.
Author: Bret Easton Ellis (novels consist of Less Than Zero and The Rules of Attraction, among others)
Publisher: Vintage, 1st edition (1991)

My own brief summary; The book is narrated by Patrick Bateman, a young man living in Manhattan during the late 80’s. He is a successful businessman who is indulgent, class conscience and parties excessively. To the observer, he is nearly flawless, perfect in every facet of his life. But to the reader, privy to his darkness... he is a serial killer.

The reason I chose to read this book was because of a blog post that someone had done, naming their top films based on books. American Psycho was one of them. Having seen the movie ages ago, I briefly remembered the general plot to the story. Never did I ever imagine, the book would go into such depth regarding the sickness that the main character harbored. There are many arguments behind this book and I will have to warn you, that if you attempt to read this book, understand it is very graphic. But as I found... you cannot take key scenes out of context. They are to be pondered as a whole and it is not until you get to the very end, can you truly appreciate this book. What started off as hatred for this character, this author... turned to adoration for a unique and politically poignant novel. This review may have to be broken up into sections so I can clearly gather my thoughts.

My review; To be honest, a short blog post will not do justice to this book. It is so deeply convoluted, that I truly believe only the author can really explain his intent behind the character. But, I will do my best.

On the surface, you’ll find the first part of the book really mundane. I mean, REALLY dry. Narrated by Bateman, you get a glimpse into his very structured, but very extravagant life. Set in 1989, Bateman is the epitome of yuppie (so much so, that I found myself gagging at times). He has expensive lunches and dinners, has an affinity with high end labels, loves to rent videos, does an ungodly amount of cocaine and describes people in detail by their designer clothing--down to their sock. He is consumed with only having the “latest" and “best" and it is apparent in his decor at home, his office and what he, himself chooses to wear. Just to warn you, this is repeated through the entire book. At first, this really worked on my nerves because I found him to be so superficial, but the more I read, the more I wondered if the novel was trying to say something deeper--was it trying to show an era of decadence, of consumerism at its worst? Dunno.

Then it seems somewhere in the middle of the novel, Bateman begins to change. We get a sense of disenchantment from the peers that Bateman has surrounded himself with; the conversations become strained and it seems that there is a sense of anonymity among the group. Bateman tests this many times by slipping murderous confessions during their banter, only to find his friends ignore him or not believe him--some don't even recognize him.

But by the time you reach the last half of the book, you are completely thrust knee deep into the psychotic, evil and demented mind of Patrick Bateman. In the end, there is a sense of ambiguity as the author leaves you wondering if Bateman has even committed any of the murders, or are they merely demonic illusions of his imagination.


Just some fair warnings (much easier to list):

1) There are a lot of racial slurs in the book and a lot of crude remarks in reference to homosexuals and homeless people. It can be disturbing, but keep in mind the content is in relation to the character, Bateman and how he views the world.

2) The murders are sadistic and graphic; genital mutilation, cannibalism and necrophilia. I was very worried that I would not be able to read most of the chapters, but surprisingly, I survived. Again, set in the context of the novel, it works. Singularly, it would blow you're freaking mind and make you want to bleach your brain from such horrors.

3) There are three chapters I refused to read: The chapter dedicated to Genesis and Phil Collins, the chapter dedicated to Whitney Houston, and the chapter dedicated to Huey Lewis and the News. Patrick Bateman obviously has bad taste in music.

So how to summarize such a unique book?

Well, it took me getting to the end of the novel to realize that I liked the book. More than I thought I would. It’s not an easy read, by far, and let me tell you the constant labeling is overwhelming, but I imagine at the time when it was written, relevant.

In a nutshell, the story is about a serial killer in the late 8o’s, early 90’s. Though he has moments of lucidity, by the last half of the book, he's clearly insane. He’s hallucinating, indulging in devilish activity with his victims and has a full-on panic attack, which leads to his confession via phone to his attorney. In the end, his attorney (who does not even recognize him), thinks the message left on his machine is a prank. On top of that, the attorney informs Bateman that the co-worker that he thinks he has murdered is alive, residing in London. For what purpose, is unknown. But Bateman confirms that the co-worker’s apartment is vacant and in the process of being rented/sold. There is a moment of confusion, as Bateman has used this apartment to kill other victims, even storing some of them in the apartment. As Bateman loses his grip on reality, he becomes increasingly sloppy with his killings, diving deeper into his insanity... yet he is never caught for any of his crimes and disturbingly, the book ends with a casual lunch.

As a reader, you are left to ponder this: Did any of the murders even occur?

So, that was one of the most confusing reviews I've ever done. What do you think? In the end, I'll go beyond my comfort zone and say this book deserves four stars for its creativity and willingness to push the political boundary of our society. It is not for the faint of heart and it will require you to think beyond the final chapters of the book, maybe even making you feel little psycho yourself...



3/4/11

Book Blog Hop!

We looooove our Fridays!! Noe has two book reviews that she will be posting next week (something about having to do this thing they call, "homework"?) and I will hopefully for the love of God, finish American Psycho by Bret Easton, which has not been an easy read. And after I bleach my brain from that character, I will move on to Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini (btw, the movie is excellent and available on Netflix Instant).

Also, I will be seeing an advanced screening of Red Riding directed by Catherine Hardwicke, so look for my movie review as well next week!

Book Blog Hop!!

Book Blogger Hop

In the spirit of the Twitter Friday Follow, the Book Blogger Hop is a place just for book bloggers and readers to connect and share our love of the written word! This weekly BOOK PARTY is an awesome opportunity for book bloggers to connect with other book lovers, make new friends, support each other, and generally just share our love of books! It will also give blog readers a chance to find other book blogs to read! 

This week's question comes from Mia who blogs at Girl About Books: "Who's your all-time favorite book villain?"
Okay, here is my answer and I'm being completely hypocritical by saying this, but strangely, I am drawn toward Patrick Bateman in American Psycho. Maybe it's because I'm currently reading the novel, maybe it's because I can picture Christian Bale as the character. He's a serial killer and in no way, a saint, but through his eyes you get a glimpse of the late 80's yuppie culture. They call the novel a political satire, and I can see that at times it is but I'm not going to lie, twenty years later, it's hard to digest. For me, I've never read anything like this and he is by far the most "evil" character I've come across, but I'm only half way through and yet to discover if the author will reveal, why? Suz (Sorry, for the convoluted answer!)

So to recap this week, I was only able to post a movie review, Peep World directed by Barry W. Blaustein. Think of it as a marriage between the show, Arrested Development and the film, Sideways. The movie hits theatres March 25, 2011. You can read my review, here.

To read my weekly film newsletter, Screen Shots, distributed by Inside Out Hawaii Magazine, click here. There is a less candid review of Peep World, film and movie news and our DVD recommendation, 127 Hours.

And that's all folks, Have a great weekend! 

3/1/11

Peep World Directed by Barry W. Blaustein

Peep World
Rated R

Summary: On the day of their Father's 70th birthday party, four siblings come to terms with the publication of a novel written by the youngest sibling, that exposes the family's most intimate secrets.

The beginning of the film is actually a glimpse into the ending; a formal dinner at a restaurant, a large family sitting at the table, curse words being thrown.

We then flash back to the events that lead up to this disastrous dinner and get a more detailed look into the lives of four siblings, each strange and odd, their secrets made public by the youngest sibling's best selling novel, Peep World.

Nathan (Ben Schwartz), the author of this best selling book has not only aired his family's dirty laundry in his novel, but is in the process of filming the movie version of their lives as well. He is condescending and has erectile dysfunction.

Cheri (Sarah Silverman) is a foul mouth, wannabe actress that is a member of Jews for Jesus and a raging bitch to all her family members, including her boyfriend that she has been with for eight years--though she hasn't slept with him... We think. The film version of this tell-all book is being shot in front of her apartment building. She's pissed.

Joel (Rainn Wilson) is deadbeat attorney that had to take the bar exam eight times, only has one case--his girlfriends divorce, and borrows money from his brother, Jack incessantly. He's also wanted by the Honduras Credit Union, aka, two large thugs.

And then there is Jack (Michael C. Hall), a failing architect that has a wife who curses in her sleep while saying his name, tries hard to be the "good" guy in the family, lends an incredible amount of money to his loser brother, Joel and has an addiction to peep shows and porn. He will also be having his first child in 7 weeks.

To say this family is dysfunctional is almost comical. They are in desperate need of help!

At the beginning of the film, we felt a little of an "Arrested Development" feel to the film, with a narrator introducing each character and all their weird idiosyncrasies. And that vibe continued to about half way through the movie... until we get to the last half. Then it seems that the movie became a little more serious as we discover the pain behind each sibling. A lot of their peculiar behavior stems from a father who never really invested in his children, emotionally. Being a very successful architect himself, it seems that his affections are only for those who have something to show for. The father is basically a total asshole.

For me, the movie was somewhere in the middle. I think I initially associated it with Arrested Development due to its similarities, that I wanted it so much to be on that level of humor. But it wasn't. It definitely had moments of laugh out loud antics, then it would totally switch on you and get very dark and dramatic (which ended up being a good portion of the movie). The story is good, but not great. I honestly wished it would have been funnier, but nonetheless, it still was an entertaining film.


Cast and Credit: 
Directed by Barry W. Blaustein
Ron Rifken-Henry
Ben Schwartz-Nathan
Rainn Wilson-Joel
Sarah Silverman-Cheri
Michael C. Hall-Jack

Peep World opens in theatres March 25, 2011.
 
Blog designed by TwispiredBlogdesign using Vera Lim Design'sG'Night Sweetheart kit.